IRAs: Mistakes and Misconceptions

Take-Away: A week ago I provided a review of the stretch IRA rules. I mentioned that often there are a lot of mistakes either in applying required minimum distribution (RMD) rules or making assumptions that are not always accurate. What follows are some mistakes and misconceptions often encountered in the world of IRAs. Failure to […]

Read More

Per Stipes vs. Per Capita and Rules of Construction: In the eye of the beholder but for the Michigan Antilapse Statute

Take-Away: In past weeks we have had discussions about the difference between per stirpes and per capita used in wills, trusts and beneficiary designations and other formal ‘rules of construction.’ Despite  long-standing definitions of these terms, their causal use can still create disputes in the interpretation of a will or trust where these terms are […]

Read More

Stretch IRAs Revisited

Take-Away: The tax planning concept of stretch IRAs survived the 2017 Tax Cut Act, and reports of the stretch IRA’s demise were premature. Stretch IRAs are still with us, but so are the often byzantine rules with regard to distributions from an inherited IRA. With the reprieve of the stretch IRA distribution rules let’s consider […]

Read More

The Death of the Fiduciary Rule – Is It Premature?

Take-Away: In 2016 the Department of Labor expanded ERISA’s definition of investment advice fiduciary to include investment advice that is given with regard to an IRA account, informally called the Fiduciary Rule. This Rule has endured a rocky start. With the new administration in Washington, the implementation of the Fiduciary Rule has been delayed until […]

Read More

Take-Away: Sometimes what we do not treat as property may nonetheless be subject to transfer taxation, which often comes as a surprise to advisors and an even bigger surprise to clients and their heirs who have to pay a transfer tax on what they consider to be a phantom asset. History Lesson:  The first time […]

Read More

Asset Protection Trusts

Take-Away: A recent decision by the Alaska Supreme Court, Toni 1 Trust vs. Wacker, 2018 WL 1125033 (Alaska, March 2, 2018),  created some  anxiety with regard to the viability of self-settled asset protection trusts, much like Michigan’s Qualified Dispositions in Trust Act. This court decision may not be the death-knell to asset protection trusts as […]

Read More

Retirement Plan and IRA Hardship Distributions: Rule Changes in 2019

Take-Away: Hardship distribution rules from qualified plan retirement accounts [not IRAs] changed in February 2018  immediately on the heels of the 2017 Tax Reduction Act. One proposed change with the 2017 Tax Reduction Act that got dropped at the last minute just became the law in February 2018. This is just one more example of […]

Read More

2017 Tax Act: New Planning With Non-Grantor Trusts

Take-Away: The 2017 Tax Act  forces us to look at planning with a new perspective. The new focus is on saving income taxes, and less on saving estate and GST taxes with each individual now having a $11.2 million transfer tax exemption. In particular, how do we help clients to ‘work around’ the doubled standard […]

Read More

Asset Protection Trusts: Better than a Prenuptial Agreement?

Take-Away: After a relatively ‘dubious’ history of success in the courts over the past few years, there is now one ‘successful’ published court decision with regard to the effectiveness of an asset protection trust. This reported decision comes out of Nevada. While 17 states, including Michigan, have some form of asset protection trust, there persists […]

Read More

Charitable Remainder Trusts: An Old Tool to Fix a New Problem

The Tax Cut and Jobs Act (the 2017 Tax Act) provided several surprises, although I am not sure that it actually delivered that much simplification to a complex tax code as was promised. One big surprise was to make alimony or spousal support no longer tax deductible by the payer or taxable to the recipient. […]

Read More