A recent missive summarized Trump Accounts created under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, or OBBBA. As a quick refresher, a Trump Account can be created for a child who is born between 2025 and 2028. Up to $5,000 can be contributed to the Trump Account each year. If such an account is opened, the U.S. government will contribute $1,000 to it. In addition, employers can also contribute to that account, up to $2,500 annually, and that contribution will not be treated as taxable income to the employee.

Gambling losses just became even more costly under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This change complicates an already burdensome tracking process. Will this change provide new motivation to misreport or bypass official avenues of reporting? Will some gamblers now have an incentive to gamble at unlicensed international sites where there is minimal oversight and safeguards. This is just one of the many unintended consequences of the rushed-through OBBBA that we will watch be played out in the year(s) to come.

Now permanent applicable exclusion amount of $15 million per individual, new income tax deductions that can be phased out if the individual reports too large adjusted gross income, or the desire to shift income using non-grantor trusts for descendants in lower marginal income tax brackets, and a renewed focus on exposing trust assets to a basis step-up on the death of a surviving spouse.

The new Tax Bill did not directly make any changes to IRAs and other retirement plans, but it indirectly creates more incentives to save for retirement and to convert traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs.

The difference in the OBBBA limit on tips and overtime compensation for single individuals, but not married individuals, may be unintentional, considering the fact the phase-in limit language is identical for these two OBBBA deductions. The House version of the OBBBA bill did not include any limit at all, so that language was added (someone has reported, in secret) in the Senate’s version of the bill. Was this difference intended by the Senate, or the House, or anybody who took the time to read the bill before voting on it? This marriage penalty -or- marriage bonus interpretation is probably just a small glitch that can be clarified in the Proposed Regulations.

Most folks who will qualify to claim this new auto loan interest deduction will probably not have $10,000 of interest expense a year. Also, the phaseout level starts at low amounts for individuals who are likely to be able to afford a new car. And as mentioned, given the price differential between new and used cars, the tax-savings of deducting loan interest will probably not be enough to justify purchasing a new car just to claim the interest deduction.

With new estate planning strategies seemingly appearing each month, a settlor should be able to choose the governing law for any aspect of his/her trust. Hopefully, with a new, model conflicts-of-law act and Restatement on the horizon a more streamlined approach will exist to reduce future conflict-of-law situations when dealing with trusts.

At a time when the government seems to be backing away from financing social welfare programs, more individuals will be looking to local charities for help. It is not clear if charities will also suffer from these new charitable deduction rules if a donor has less incentive to engage in charitable giving.

when determining the benefits of a Roth conversion, now must be factored in the impact of the new senior deduction and the increase in the SALT deduction, or more accurately the impact of their phaseout rules. These deductions enhance the opportunity of a Roth conversion, but their phaseouts may put at risk larger Roth conversions for high earners.

While income taxes at the federal level might be less onerous over the next decade, the states will have to step forward and fill the ‘revenue void’ with increased state income rates to address the larger revenue burdens they will face going forward as the federal government steps back.